Request for Amendments to Article by North West Bylines

Response Regarding North West Online Article published 5th August 2025

I can confirm that an email was received by our server on Wednesday, 30th July. However, during this time, the show organiser, Richard, was away on holiday. It appears that upon his return, the email was accidentally deleted—something for which he sincerely apologises. This oversight is regrettable, and I will amend my public comment accordingly.

That said, we are formally requesting that the article be amended to reflect fair and accurate journalism. Several statements currently presented are either misleading or factually incorrect.

Key Points for Correction:

Statement 1: “Blackpool Council has warned the venue that trading animals would be illegal.”

This is factually incorrect. The Council has been in direct contact with both the venue and ourselves, conducting multiple visits. They have confirmed that the event is legal and have assured the venue of this. While they did raise concerns, these were address and they agreed the show could not be stopped. They requested to attend on the day—something we have welcomed. We continue to work closely with them to meet any requirements they may have.

Statement 2: “This practice was outlawed in 1983 (in an amendment to the Pet Animals Act 1951) based on the acceptance that the welfare of these animals is incompatible with the temporary and makeshift nature of a market.”

This refers to wild animals listed under Schedule 5 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. None of these listed species are for sale at our shows. The full list can be viewed here:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1981/69/schedule/5

There is no mention of “markets” in this legislation.

Section 2 of the Pet Animals Act 1951 states:

“If any person carries on a business of selling animals as pets in any part of a street or public place, or at a stall or barrow in a market, he shall be guilty of an offence.”

However, those selling animals at our events are not operating as businesses. All exhibitors sign a declaration confirming this. Any individuals found to be trading as businesses would be investigated by the council. To our knowledge, no prosecutions have been made in relation to our shows.

Furthermore, under the Animal Welfare Act 2006, pet animal market shows organised by bonafide clubs or societies are permitted, provided they meet legal and licensing requirements. We comply fully and work closely with local authorities.

Statement 3: “At these markets, reptiles and amphibians are commonly crammed into plastic tubs barely larger than the animals themselves.”

Animal transportation is necessary for ensuring genetic diversity and the health of future generations. To minimise stress and maintain biosecurity during transit, animals are housed in secure containers that are appropriate for their temporary transport. Breeders are instructed to limit time in travel enclosures and to provide enrichment where possible. Independent veterinary professionals are present at all events to monitor and ensure physical health is also prioritised.

Our show rules have requirements that must be met by exhibitors and are reviewed frequently.

Statement 4: “They happily project the appearance of professional businesses on their selling platforms, proudly displaying logos and branding.”

Anyone can create a social media page and include a logo to distinguish their hobby from their personal profile. This does not constitute running a business. Having branding does not automatically indicate commercial activity.

Statement 5: “Cash is king, so payments can’t be traced.”

This is entirely false. In fact, we have been advised by several local councils that card machines should not be used at these events. The IHS would welcome the opportunity to change this, and we continue to work with the relevant authorities on this issue.

Statement 6: “The show was banned from several other locations.”

This is untrue. Our shows have never been banned or cancelled due to legal issues. On occasion, we have had to leave venues due to ongoing harassment from activist groups. This group has targeted venue management with misinformation and unfounded claims, causing reputational damage. Despite this, our shows are regularly attended by representatives from CITES, DEFRA, local councils. Independent veterinary professionals are always in attendance.

As illustrated above, the article contains numerous inaccuracies and misleading claims. If these issues are not addressed, we will have no choice but to seek legal advice.